anotherlongshot (anotherlongshot) wrote,
anotherlongshot
anotherlongshot

It is extremely demoralising when you are this close to getting what you want but which remains elusive by the thinnest of margins; it is also extremely shattering when your efforts do not translate into results in the way that you had hoped.

I am going through some emotional turbulence at the moment, and I decided to rip off the Band-Aid regarding my abortion essay and just get the pain done and over with. The absolute disappointment that hit me when I saw what I got, coupled with the aforementioned emotional turbulence, was simply too much for me to take. I sat in Pret with coffee that did not make me feel better and I fought back tears. I wanted to skip my meeting with my Jurisprudence professor; I wanted to skip my lecture; I wanted to skip my tutorial. I wanted to drop out of my programme. I wanted to find a hole somewhere and disappear into it forever.

My day was a haze. I alternated between self-hatred and depression. I fulfilled all my obligations and the only one that amounted to anything positive or useful was my meeting with my Jurisprudence professor. When my obligations in school ended at 5pm, I felt lost, not knowing where to go, not feeling like coming back to my room but having no choice because it was too cold to go anywhere else.

I feel like I am setting myself up for failure. It is an utter joke, the gap between my expectations and reality. I don't know why this is. At the same time, I keep getting distracted by absolutely pointless things and keep getting tripped up by my utterly ill discipline, my lack of work ethics, and possibly my intellectual limitations. Perhaps I need to wake up and stop chasing the impossible...

But accepting failure is simply not an option for me. It is not a reality that I can live with. Perhaps I have finally found the root cause of my chronic unhappiness.

*

On a more positive note, my meeting with my Jurisprudence professor went amazingly well. Contrary to what I had feared, she did not laugh me out of her office; quite the opposite. I am still quite shocked that she actually liked all of my ideas, but rejected the morality one outright because it was simply too massive a task to tackle the meta-physical question that she formulated for me based on my scattered ramblings. She really liked the Satanic Verses/Habermas/free speech/religion one, but seemed to think that I should write about either religion in the public sphere or artistic expression in the public sphere, but not both. I think the crux of what I want to do is a mix of both, but more of the latter that touches on issues of the former when the latter offences the religious sensibilities of a group of people in a plural society.

She liked the torture/Kant one too and actually formulated off the top of her head the entire structure of the essay for me. I was really intrigued by her idea of applying not just Kant's moral philosophy to the issue, but his legal philosophy as well. The moral question is pretty cut-and-dry at this point: you can't use people as means, and therefore you can't torture a person to get information out of him (something like that; I'm missing an intermediate step but I'm too lazy to articulate it now). The legal question, however, is rather more interesting and less obvious; and it's so much less obvious that I know too little about it to write about it now.

In any event, she suggested that I did the public sphere one, so I'm going to do a draft bibliography on Friday or something to see if it's viable. I totally appreciate that she's going to help me with my sources; I am quite clueless when it comes to these things. At least for Theory of Human Rights, I know some of the commonly-cited philosophers/theorists like Dworkin, Waldron and Griffin, so I have an idea of where to start. This Jurisprudence essay, on the other hand, is like being stranded in the middle of the ocean - I have the ability to swim, but I have no idea which way to swim to.

Anyway, I'm glad that's settled for now.

Unfortunately, I did not finish any of the readings for the classes this week. I gave up on the Forst article at 10 past 5 yesterday and went to shower and get ready for the LLM Annual Dinner at Lincoln's Inn; I plan to finish it before the 4pm class. I haven't read the case for Terrorism and I definitely have not read the Derrida extract for Jurisprudence. I don't think I'm going to try; it's another bloody translated article and it's just going to annoy me.

I wish I didn't have to do an exam for Jurisprudence. Trying to memorise all these things is...sigh.

*

I only slept 3 hours so I should go to bed now.
Tags: llm, personal
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 0 comments