anotherlongshot (anotherlongshot) wrote,
anotherlongshot
anotherlongshot

Madrid Masters 2010: OMG nightmare final.

With both Roger and Nadal facing crappy opponents in their respective SFs, the likelihood of them meeting each other since Madrid last year has just become a very real probability.

I know Roger won their last match-up, I know Roger is GOAT, BUT FUCK RAFA IS FUCKING SCARY ON CLAY. HE HASN'T LOST A SINGLE MATCH ON CLAY. AND IT'S GONNA TAKE SOME SERIOUS EXHAUSTION ON HIS PART AND ROGER PLAYING OUT OF HIS SKIN FOR ROGER TO WIN.

BOOO. Nadal's lucky to get NICOLAS ALMAGRO as his SF opponent 'cause, yeah, he's not even seeded. He really didn't have anyone dangerous in his half, except John Isner, but...Isner really had no chance. I watched a bit of the match and even I was impressed by some of Nadal's WTF winners (passing winners from way behind the baseline - seriously, they're incredible).

OMG I'M SCARED. I HOPE NADAL LOSES OMG.

Roger's facing David Ferrer. I think I'd rather he faced Murray 'cause he's so crap on clay. But still, Roger's gonna win in 2.

And yessss he beat Gulbis HAHAHA.

Okay lunch!

Will write substantial entry soonish.

Tags: ernests gulbis, madrid masters, nicolas almagro, rafael nadal, roger federer, sports, tennis
Subscribe

  • (no subject)

    My knee is getting better...well, of course, it was always going to get better. It's perhaps 70% back to normal, though I still can't walk 100%…

  • I HATE Injuries

    Today, I tried to walk to a nearby cafe for brunch as I have three 40% discount vouchers expiring sometime next week. Since the food is tasty, I had…

  • (no subject)

    My writing; so lazy! If there were to be one particular cause for the failure that is my life, it would, without a shadow of a doubt, be my laziness;…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 0 comments