anotherlongshot (anotherlongshot) wrote,
anotherlongshot
anotherlongshot

WTF IS THIS FUCKERY.

CAN THE PLAINTIFF, WITH HER PERSONALITY, BE REASONABLY EXPECTED TO LIVE WITH THE DEFENDANT?

WHAT THE HELL DO YOU MEAN "REASONABLE"?

I AM SO SICK OF THIS STUPID OVER-USED AND OFTEN-MEANINGLESS WORD IN LAW.

IT ANNOYS ME THAT THERE WOULD EVER EXIST A SITUATION IN WHICH A TOTAL STRANGER WOULD SIT IN JUDGMENT OF SOMEONE'S GRIEVANCES OVER HER MARRIAGE AND THEN PRONOUNCE HER GRIEVANCES "UNREASONABLE". IS THERE REALLY AN OBJECTIVE TEST WHEN IT COMES TO THINGS OF THE HEART?

TRY TO BE OBJECTIVE. TRY TO BE OBJECTIVE. LET'S SEE HOW YOU TRY TO BE OBJECTIVE WHEN YOU'RE THE ONE CRYING OVER A BROKEN MARRIAGE.

I'M SO GLAD I DIDN'T TAKE FAMILY LAW IN SCHOOL. THIS IS REALLY PISSING ME OFF.

Tags: legal profession, rant
Subscribe

  • Angst

    I had some white wine with E and his housemate last night while watching a film called Clemency. I don’t know if it was the wine, or the fact that I…

  • The Real vs The Unreal

    I haven't blogged very much these days because there's only so much writing I can do in a day: the PhD (let's not talk about this), and the Daredevil…

  • Cambridge Half Marathon

    After a couple of days of angst about it, especially the fundraising part (one of the most tedious and disgustingly self-aggrandizing things I've…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 0 comments